Recently, I was watched " river of bloody battle Hunan " , feeling fine is much.
近日，我观看了《血战湘江》，感触良多。
" river of bloody battle Hunan " after telling about a Red Army the 5th times to turn over war of encircle and suppress to fail, be forced during long march enemy of river of Hunan of fight one's way across a river, breakthrough blocks 4 times the story of the line. In film, the Red Army because the serious and left mistake with Li De, ancient rich, be on risk grade. Red Army column is final overshoot below the protection of each Red Army army group Hunan river. Among them the Red Army procrastinates with dying in maple foot enemy, Red Army 34 division are completely annihilated basically, common people gives Red Army commissariat and a clue that another Red Army pours in hematic river actively to let a person touch; The Red Army man is red the heroism of Chen Shuxiang of Li Tianyou of 5 division division commander and division commander is fought enemy, Mao Zedong medicaments for many times donative soldier, Zhou En will give orders to discard fight one's way across a river of supplies and gear of an army, Lin Jialao 4 in be informed father and elder brothers to all die at the war.
《血战湘江》讲述了红军第五次反围剿战争失败后，被迫长征期间强渡湘江、突破敌人四道封锁线的故事。影片中，红军由于李德、博古的严重左倾错误，走上险路。红军纵队最终在各个红军军团的保护下渡过湘江。其中红军在枫树脚以死拖敌、红军34师基本全军覆没、百姓主动赠送红军粮食和一个又一个红军倒在血河中的情节让人感动；红军红五师师长李天佑和师长陈树湘的英勇抗敌、毛泽东将药物多次赠与战士、周恩来下令丢弃辎重强渡、林家老四在得知父兄皆死于战争中却仍毅然加入红军、遵义会议等情节也激动人心。
In this film, having a few people deserve attention. It is Li De first, he is prideful, the proposal of inexorable other, be an armchair strategist, the mistake that lets a lot of soldiers die at him is decision-making, strike the table is returned to go on conference of abide by justice person, be a model is dead not repentant generation; It is Mao Zedong next, he judges the error with a decision-making one's own side clearly, be brave in to oppugn a high level, human relation seize power is not used after angrily rebuke by, submit to humiliation, use real operation to fall the loss to lowest, final in abide by the pacifically on justice meeting cancelled gain the top director of ancient, Li Zunwen heart counterpoises, concentration corrected rich ancient, Li De is decision-making on left mistake, the right course ” of the Marxism that successfully actual establish “ is a delegate with Mao Zedong is in the leadership position of the Central Committee of Communist Party of China, showed the wisdom with a due cacique and method to still have an idea; It is Peng Dehuai then, although he also understands a high level decision-making have by accident, but be eager to be being corrected immediately, be unable to bear strength, method and brains and a cacique are having big difference, also showed his trustful sex to Mao Zedong fully; Finally is rich ancient, he is junior promising, age became a of 3 people group gently, but what believe Li De blindly however is decision-making, devoid definite idea, lead to blunder finally with Li De, but he knows a fault to be able to change, listen to receive the opinion of other, still have wind of a few degrees of head model.
在这部电影中，有几个人物是值得关注的。先是李德，他自傲，听不进他人的建议，纸上谈兵，让许多战士死于他的错误决策，在遵义会议上还拍案走人，是典型的死不悔改之辈；然后是毛泽东，他清晰地判断出己方决策的失误，勇于质疑高层，遭怒斥后不利用人际关系夺权，忍气吞声，用实际行动将损失降到最低，最终在遵义会上和平地取消了博古、李作文德的最高指挥权，集中纠正了博古、李德决策上左的错误，成功地实际确立“以毛泽东为代表的马克思主义的正确路线”在中共中央的领导地位，表现出了一位领袖应有的智慧与手段还有观念；接着是彭德怀，他虽然也明白高层的决策有误，但急于立刻纠正，耐不住性子，手段和头脑与一位领袖有着大的差距，也透露出了他对毛泽东的信任性；最后是博古，他年少有为，年纪轻轻就成为了三人团的一员，但却盲目相信李德的决策，缺乏主见，最终与李德酿成大错，但他知错能改，听得进他人的意见，还有几度领袖风范。
In daily life, can have not we encountered the trouble that resembles at this part how again? When didn't our teacher, magisterial, boss err? But we can be accomplished really raise doubt to them, is the organization corrected? Often be incapable, what solve in that way like Chairman Mao is more little little. From inside this film I also understood, be brave in to raise doubt only, use the means that both sides can accept, for many times bargaining, solve a problem finally, ability lets in-house and right tune, let an organization become more outstanding.
在日常生活中，我们又怎会没遇到过于此有几分相像的事呢？我们的老师、长官、上司就没有犯错的时候吗？可我们真的能做到向他们提出质疑，组织纠正吗？往往是不能的，像毛主席那样解决的更是少之又少。从这部影片中我也明白了，只有勇于提出质疑，用双方都能接受的方式，多次交涉，最终解决问题，才能让内部真正的和谐，让一个组织变得更加优秀。
This is my feeling, hope everybody also can watch this movie.
这就是我的感触，希望大家也能观看此部电影。(文/朱麟)